The improvement of peasant agronomic culture: directions and forms of work of agricultural cooperation in the NEP years

Main Article Content

Alona Dabizha

Abstract

Abstract. Purpose. The author of the article aims to outline the directions and forms of agricultural cooperation
functioning in the NEP years to increase the level of peasant agriculture, assess the various cooperative agricultural measures
for gaining the marketability and profitability of farms.
Scientific novelty. On the basis of the involved sources and the application of current methodological approaches, the
directions and forms of work of agricultural cooperation in the years of the NEP to increase the level of peasant agriculture
have been highlighted, an attempt has been made to evaluate various cooperative agricultural measures to increase the
marketability and profitability of peasant households. It is proved that cooperative agricultural work was an important factor
influencing the growth of peasants’ interest in obtaining agricultural knowledge.
Conclusion. It is noted that during the NEP years agricultural cooperation as a form of mutually beneficial collaboration
of peasant farms became the centre of economic life of the Ukrainian countryside, contributed to its revival and met economic
interests of multimillion agricultural producers. In this area the cooperative network took a number of decisive and progressive
steps related to the organizational, financial and economic-productional components of the agricultural revival process and
its further development.
It is emphasized that the agricultural cooperation developed an effective mechanism for an active introduction of
agronomic culture in peasant life, which was gradually taking large-scale, rationally organized forms and directions. The
cooperation launched mass work not only among the cooperative peasantry, but also actively involved non-cooperative
farmers in the improvement of the agronomic culture, thus involving them in cooperative ranks and caring for the expansion of
agricultural knowledge among the population.
It has been proved that cooperative agricultural work was an important factor influencing the growth of peasants’ interests
in obtaining agricultural knowledge.
Agricultural cooperative measures concerning the improvement of agronomic culture of peasant farms during the NEP
years were characterized by a wide range of organizational and substantive diversity. In general, the constructive agricultural
efforts of cooperation, along with powerful productional and economic processes, were aimed at achieving maximum economic
effect, stimulated the marketability and profitability of peasant farms.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dabizha, A. (2022). The improvement of peasant agronomic culture: directions and forms of work of agricultural cooperation in the NEP years. Ukrainian Peasant, (27). https://doi.org/10.31651/2413-8142-2022-27-Dabizha
Section
Селянство за умов соціокультурних, соціально-економічнихта суспільно-політичних трансформацій ХІХ – ХХ ст
Author Biography

Alona Dabizha, Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University

Teacher of the Department of History of Ukraine, Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University, Uman, Ukraine
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5000-6986
e-mail: alyona.dabizha@ukr.net

References

Dedusenko, A. (1923). Agronomicheskaya pomosch naseleniyu Ukrainyi [Agronomic assistance to the

population of Ukraine]. Harkіv: Vseukraїnske agronomіchne tovaristvo. [in Russian].

Dulherova, O. (2006). Rol kulturno-osvitnoi roboty kooperatsii u pidnesenni ahronomichnykh znan

selianstva v period nepu [The role of cultural and educational work of the cooperative in raising the agronomic

knowledge of the peasantry in the period of the NEP]. Visnyk Cherkaskoho universytetu. Seriia: Istorychni nauky

[Cherkasy University Bulletin: Historical Sciences], 80, 94–99. [in Ukrainian].

Dulherova, O., Morozov, A. (2010). Kulturno-osvitnia robota silskohospodarskoi kooperatsii v period

NEPu [Cultural and educational work of agricultural cooperation during the NEP]. Naukovi pratsi Chornomorskoho

derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Petra Mohyly. Ser.: Istoriia [Scientific works of the Black Sea State University

named after Petro Mohyla. Series: History], 129, 116, 27–31. [in Ukrainian].

Inhulskyi, I. (1929). Masova ahronomizatsiia naselennia ta yii perspektyvy [Mass agronomization of the

population and its prospects]. Ukrainskyi ahronom [Ukrainian agronomist], 11, 55–63. [in Ukrainian].

Kolodiazna, O. (1929). Shliakhy y tempy rozvytku silskohospodarskoi kooperatsii Ukrainy na 1929–30

r. [Ways and rates of development of agricultural cooperation of Ukraine for 1929–30]. Ukrainskyi ahronom

[Ukrainian agronomist], 12, 52–61. [in Ukrainian].

Marochko, V. (1995). Ukrainska selianska kooperatsiia: istoryko-teoretychnyi aspekt (1861–1929 rr.)

[Ukrainian Peasant Cooperation: Historical and Theoretical Aspect (1861–1929)]. Kyiv: In-t istorii Ukrainy NAN

Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].

Melnyk, P. (1925). Kooperatyvna tsukro-buriakova ahronomiia (prohrama y metody yii roboty)

[Cooperative sugar and beet agronomy (program and methods of its work)]. Ukrainskyi ahronom [Ukrainian

agronomist], 1, 25–33. [in Ukrainian].

Morozov, A. (1993). Selo i hroshi. Ukrainska kredytna kooperatsiia v dobu nepu [Village and money.

Ukrainian credit union in the days of the NEP]. Cherkasy: NDITEKhIM. [in Ukrainian].

Morozov, A. (2016). Hroshi dlia hospodaria (vyrobnychi koshty sela v dokolhospnyi period 1921–

[Money for the owner (production funds of the village in the pre-farm period 1921–1929)]. Cherkasy. [in

Ukrainian].

Pro plan ahropropahandy Narkomzema [About the plan of agropropaganda of the People’s Commissariat

of Land]. Radianskyi selianyn [Soviet peasant]. 1925, 18-19, 7. [in Ukrainian].

Pyrohov, M. (1928). Raionova s-h vystavka ta konkurs plantatoriv tsukrovoho buriaku v Dzhuryni

(Mohylivshchyna) [District agricultural exhibition and competition of sugar beet planters in Dzhuryn (Mogilev

region)]. Radianskyi selianyn [Soviet peasant], 3, 24–25. [in Ukrainian].

Rozsadnyk kultury na seli [Nursery of culture in the countryside]. (1925) Radianskyi selianyn [Soviet

peasant], 13-14, 51. [in Ukrainian].

Shchadylov, O. (1925). Yak ahronomiia dopomahaie selianam [How agronomy helps the peasants].

Kharkiv: Derzhavne vydavnytstvo Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].

Shcho robyv Melnykivskyi s-h hurtok v 1927 r. [What did Melnikovsky agricultural circle in 1927.].

(1928). Radianskyi selianyn [Soviet peasant], 2, 34. [in Ukrainian].

Trenkin, Yu. (2018). Orhanizatsiino-finansove zabezpechennia ahrokulturnykh zakhodiv

silskohospodarskoi kooperatsii v dobu nepu [Organizational and financial support of agricultural activities of

agricultural cooperation in the days of the NEP]. Hileia [Gilea], 136, 48–51. [in Ukrainian].

Vidchyt Vseukrainskoho soiuzu silskohospodarskoi kooperatsii «Silskyi hospodar» za 1926–27

operatsiinyi rik (1 zhovtnia 1926 r. – 1 zhovtnia 1927 r.) [Report of the All-Ukrainian Union of Agricultural

Cooperatives «Farmer» for the 1926–27 operating year (October 1, 1926 – October 1, 1927).]. (1928) Kharkiv:

Silskyi hospodar. [in Ukrainian].

Zarudnyi, S. (1927). Vshanovuiemo Zhovten vidkryttiam zymovykh shkil [We celebrate October with the

opening of winter schools]. Kooperovane selo [Cooperative village], 20, 86–89. [in Ukrainian].