Submissions
SUBMISSIONS
The electronic version of the article in MS Word editor.
Author Details File (sample below).
Author Form
|
Last name, first name and patronymic |
|
|
Scientific degree, academic title, position, place of work |
|
|
Mail branch to receive correspondence (Zip code !!!!) / Nova Poshta branch |
|
|
|
|
|
Phone |
|
|
Title of the article |
|
|
Author’s ID in ORCID system |
|
The language of the manuscript: Ukrainian, English, Russian, Polish, Belarusian.
The manuscript should not contain the prohibited material because the journal is an open source of information.
The author (authors) of the article is (are) responsible for the content and information of the article.
The author is personally responsible for the respect of intellectual property rights.
Publication volume is not more than 0.7 conditional pages (1 conditional page is 20 thousand characters); format - A-4; font - Times New Roman Cyr; skittles - 14; interval - 1.5; margins: upper, lower, right - 1.5 cm, left - 3 cm.
Figures and tables should not break sentences in a paragraph, that is, they should be placed after the paragraph in which they are first referenced in the text.
The article begins with the UDC notation. Information about the author (authors) is indicated in English and Ukrainian: initials and surnames of the author are on the next line, they are printed in bold, capital letters in the upper right corner. At intervals, there are degrees, academic rank, position, title of department, faculty, structural unit, institution of higher education, scientific institution, etc., where the author works. e-mail; the line below is the ORCID number (http://orcid.org/), the Scopus-Author ID (indicated if there are indexed publications in Scopus).
The title of the publication is given in bold capital letters at intervals. At intervals after the title, a short abstract in Ukrainian and English and key words (7-8 words) are provided.
Structure and content of abstract (not less than 1800 characters) (font - Times New Roman Cyr; skittles - 14; interval - 1.5; margins: upper, lower, right - 1.5 cm, left - 3 cm)^
- Purpose
- Scientific novelty
- Methodology
- Conclusion
The methodology should be described only if it contains novelty and it is of interest in terms of the presented article.
The results of the work should be described accurately and informatively. The main theoretical and experimental results, actual data, identified relationships and patterns are presented.
New results and data of long-term significance, important discoveries, conclusions that disprove existing theories, as well as the data that, in the author’s opinion, are of practical importance, are preferred. The conclusions can be accompanied by the recommendations, estimations, suggestions, hypotheses described in the article.
The information contained in the title of the article should not be repeated in the text of the author’s summary. Unnecessary introductory phrases (e.g. “The author of the article considers…”) should be avoided.
Historical references, if they do not constitute the main content of the document, the description of previously published works and well-known principles are not provided in the author’s summary.
In the text of the author’s summary, it is necessary to use syntactic constructions, peculiar to the language of scientific documents, to avoid complex grammatical constructions.
In the text of the author’s summary, key words from the article text should be used.
The text of the author’s summary should be concise and clear, free from minor information, unnecessary introductory words, general and minor formulations.
Abbreviations and conventions, except for common ones, apply in exceptional cases.
Key words should not repeat the title of the article. The abstract should contain a concise statement of the article content, and should not repeat the title of the article. At intervals, the body text of the article begins with the paragraph. Paragraph has 1.25 cm indentation.
All tables in the paper are submitted as a separate file in Microsoft Excel format.
The structure of the article should contain the following headings: problem statement, the purpose of the article, resaerch analysis. the statement of the basic material, conclusions.
At the bottom of the footnotes page are made according to State Standard of 2015: author, title, place of publication, publisher, year of publication, reference page or total number of pages.
At the end of the paper, a references list should be arranged according to the Latin alphabet under the title References using the APA style.
In details – http://www.apastyle.org/learn/tutorials/basics-tutorial.aspx
References should be transliterated (for publications in Ukrainian, Russian or other Cyrillic languages). It is necessary to use the recommended transliterators:
http://www.slovnyk.ua/translit.php - for ukrainian text (passport regime)
http://translit-online.ru/pasport.html - for russian text.
Acknowledgements are given at the end of the article (to those who provided assistance during the study e.g., institutions, organizations, foundations, individual workers, etc.) as well as the information on research funding.
SAMPLE
UDC 94(477):341.485(=161.2)"1932/1933"(045)
Serhii Kornovenko
PhD hab. (History), Professor, Department of Intellectual Property and Civil Law Disciplines, Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy, Cherkasy, Ukraine
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6268-2321
e-mail: s-kornovenko@ukr.net
HOLODOMOR OF 1932-1933:
THE FINAL OF THE PEASANT REVOLUTION
Abstract. The aim is to consider the Holodomor of 1932-1933, taking into account the events of the peasant revolution of 1902-1933 in Ukraine.
The scientific novelty of the publication lies in the explanation of the Holodomor of 1932-1933 as a tool for the physical and spiritual destruction of another for the Soviet authorities - the Ukrainian peasant-ideoman, an active subject of the peasant revolution of 1902-1933 in Ukraine.
Conclusions. In the late 1920s and early 1930s, Soviet totalitarianism, implementing agrarian policy in the Ukrainian countryside, forming a new type of Soviet peasant, represented a peasant counter-revolution. Its goal was clear and understandable - not only the physical, but also the spiritual and cultural destruction of the Ukrainian peasant-ideoman, formed at the beginning of the 20th century.
From the end of the 1920s to the beginning of the 1930s, the totalitarianism of the Soviet Union, applying taxes, grain procurement, artificially provoking the Holodomor of 1932-1933, forming a new type of Soviet peasant, represented a peasant counter-revolution. His goals were clear and understandable - not just physical destruction, but spiritual and cultural destruction of the Ukrainian peasant ideologems that were formed at the beginning of the 20th century. The Holodomor of 1932–1933 destroyed the Ukrainian idealistic peasantry, the traditional Ukrainian peasant culture. It caused serious damage to the identity of Ukrainians.
Key words: peasant, Holodomor, totalitarianism, peasant-ideomaniac.
Сергій Корновенко
доктор історичних наук, професор, професор кафедри археології та спеціальних галузей історичної науки, Черкаський національний університет імені Богдана Хмельницького, м. Черкаси, Україна
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6268-2321
e-mail: s-kornovenko@ukr.net
ГОЛОДОМОР 1932 – 1933 РР.:
ФІНАЛ СЕЛЯНСЬКОЇ РЕВОЛЮЦІЇ
Анотація. Мета – розглянути Голодомор 1932 – 1933 рр. із урахуванням подій селянської революції 1902 – 1933 рр. в Україні.
Наукова новизна публікації полягає в поясненні Голодомору 1932 – 1933 рр. як інструменту реалізації фізичного і духовного нищення іншого для радянської влади – українського селянина-ідеомана, активного суб’єкта Селянської революції 1902 – 1933 рр. в Україні.
Висновки. Наприкінці 1920-х – на початку 1930-х рр. радянський тоталітаризм, реалізовуючи аграрну політику в українському селі, формуючи новий тип радянського селянина, представляв собою селянську контрреволюцію. Її мета була чітка і зрозуміла – не лише фізичне, а і духовно-культурне знищення українського селянина-ідеомана, сформованого на початку ХХ ст.
З кінця 1920-х до початку 1930-х років тоталітаризм Радянського Союзу, застосовуючи податки, хлібозаготівлі, штучно спровокувавши Голодомор 1932 – 1933 рр., формуючи новий тип радянського селянина, представляв собою селянську контрреволюцію. Його цілі були чіткі й зрозумілі – не просто фізичне знищення, а духовне й культурне знищення українських селянських ідеологем, що сформувалися на початку ХХ ст. Голодомор 1932–1933 рр. знищив українське ідеалістичне селянство, традиційну українську селянську культуру. Він завдав серйозної шкоди ідентичності українців.
Ключові слова: селянин, Голодомор, тоталітаризм, селянин-ідеоман.
Problem statement. [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT]
Resaerch analysis. [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT]
The authors of the article aim to consider the Holodomor of 1932-1933, taking into account the events of the peasant revolution of 1902-1933 in Ukraine.
The statement of the basic material. [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT]
The conclusions. [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT] [TEXT]
References:
1. Bezanson, (1993). Viina bilshovykiv proty selian. [The war of the Bolsheviks against the peasants]. Vsesvit. [Universe], 9–10. [in Ukrainian].