The relationship between the concepts of “artified famine” and “Holodomor” in the semantic and chronological dimension

Main Article Content

Victor Hudz

Abstract

The purpose of the article: the study of the conceptual component of the concepts «Holodomor» and «artificial
famine» and the correlation of these concepts in terms of semantic content and chronological dimensions.
The scientific novelty of the research is determined by the combination of historical and historiographical discourses in
defining the semantics of the concepts «Holodomor» and «artificial famine» and their substantive and temporal boundaries.
The differences of the artificial famine in the first half of 1932 were revealed. from the organization of the genocide and the
implementation of its measures since the end of October this year.
The methodological basis of the research is classical scientific-historical technologies — historiographical, textological,
historical-comparative, problem-chronological methods.
Conclusions. A substantiated thesis that the revisionist practice of deconstructing the term «Holodomor» and the patriotic
transfer of such a definition to other famines of the first half of the 20th century. level the uniqueness of the Holodomor
as a genocide of the Ukrainian people. It has been found that researchers often expand the boundaries of the Holodomor to
December 1931 or the first half of 1932 or/and to 1934, which blurs the line between an artificial famine and the Holodomor
as an organized genocide. It was clarified that on October 22, the Extraordinary Commission for the procurement of bread
V. Molotov, organized the genocidal measures of the Holodomor. It is proposed to use the terminology «Russian-Bolshevik
Holodomor», «communist Holodomor», as a sign of the corresponding mentality of the genocidals, but not in the often used
variant «Ukrainian Holodomor». The expediency of classifying the Holodomor as genocide on a national basis is confirmed —
the technology of a preventive «devastating blow» against a nation-state in accordance with the «Convention on the Prevention
of the Crime of Genocide and its Punishment» adopted by the UN.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hudz, V. (2024). The relationship between the concepts of “artified famine” and “Holodomor” in the semantic and chronological dimension. Ukrainian Peasant, (33). https://doi.org/10.31651/2413-8142-2024-33-Hudz
Section
The Holodomor 1932 – 1932
Author Biography

Victor Hudz, Department of History and Archeology, Melitopol State Pedagogical University named after Bohdan Khmelnytskyi

Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Department of History and Archeology, Melitopol State Pedagogical University named after Bohdan Khmelnytskyi, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5756-1683
е-mail: gudz_viktor@mspu.edu.ua

References

Arconada, Ledesma, P. & Garcia Andrés, C. (2023).The situation of the peasantry during the Holodomor

through the press outside the Soviet Union (1932–1933). Ukrainskyi Selianyn. [Ukrainian peasant], 29,

–89. [in English]. doi:10.31651/2413-8142-2023-29-Arconada-Ledesma-Cesar-García

Baykyenich, H., Okhrimchuk, O. & Tylishchak, V. (2024). [Informatsiyni materialy do 91-kh rokovyn Holodomoru

–1933 rokiv [Information materials to the 91st anniversary of the Holodomor of 1932–1933].

URL: https://uinp.gov.ua/informaciyni-materialy/zhurnalistam/informaciyni-materialy-do-91-h-rokovyngolodomoru-

-1933-rokiv [in Ukrainian].

Holod 1932–1933 rokiv na Ukrayini: ochyma istorykiv, movoyu dokumentiv [The famine of 1932–1933 in

Ukraine: through the eyes of historians, in the language of documents]. (1990) Kyyiv: Politvydav Ukrayiny.

[in Ukrainian].

Holodomor 1921–1923 rr.: stolittya trahediyi (2023) [The Holodomor 1921–1923: a century of tragedy]. URL:

http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/node/5549 [in Ukrainian].

Holodomor 1946–1947 vstup [The Holodomor 1946–1947 introduction]. (2023) URL: https://old.uinp.gov.ua/

publication/golodomor-1946–1947-vstup [in Ukrainian].

Hratsiozi, A. (2005). Holod u SRSR 1931–1933 rr. ta ukrayinsʹkyy holodomor: chy mozhlyva nova interpretatsiya

[The Famine in the USSR 1931–1933 and the Ukrainian Holodomor: Is a New Interpretation Possible].

Ukrayinsʹkyy istorychnyy zhurnal, 5, 120–131. [in Ukrainian].

Hudzʹ, V. (2019). Istoriohrafiya Holodomoru 1932–1933 rokiv v Ukrayini: monohrafiya [Historiography of the

Holodomor of 1932–1933 in Ukraine: monograph]. Melitopolʹ: FOP Odnoroh T. V. [in Ukrainian].

Kosyk, V. (2007). Pidsovyet·sʹka Ukrayina mizh dvoma svitovymy viynamy (Z nahody 75-richchya Holodomoru)

[Sub-Soviet Ukraine between the Two World Wars (On the Occasion of the 75th Anniversary of the

Holodomor)]. Problemy istoriyi Ukrayiny: fakty, sudzhennya, poshuky [Problems of the history of Ukraine:

facts, judgments, research] ,17, 174–198. [in Ukrainian].

Kulʹchytsʹkyy, S. (1999). Ukrayina mizh dvoma viynamy (1921–1939 rr.) [Ukraine between two wars

(1921–1939)]. Kyiv: Alʹternatyvy. [in Ukrainian].

Kulʹchytsʹkyy, S. (2014). Ukrayinsʹkyy Holodomor v konteksti polityky Kremlya pochatku 1930-kh rr.

[Ukrainian Holodomor in the context of Kremlin policy in the early 1930s] Kyiv: Instytut istoriyi Ukrayiny.

[in Ukrainian].

Marcus, D. (2003). Famine Crimes in International Law. The American Journal of International Law, 97,

–281. [in English].

Marochko, V. & Movchan, O. (2008). Holodomor 1932–1933 rokiv v Ukrayini: Khronika [The Holodomor of

–1933 in Ukraine: Chronicle]. Kyiv: Kyyevo-Mohylyansʹka akademiya. [in Ukrainian].

Marochko, V. (2013).Terytoriya Holodomoru: terminolohichnyy ta sotsialʹno-demohrafichnyy dyskursy [Territory

of the Holodomor: terminological and socio-demographic discourses]. Problemy istoriyi Ukrayiny: fakty,

sudzhennya, poshuky [Problems of the history of Ukraine: facts, judgments, research], 22, 166–178. [in

Ukrainian].

Materialy Mizhnarodnoyi konferentsiyi «Shtuchni holody v Ukrayini ХХ stolittya» (Kyyiv, 16 travnya 2018

roku). (2018) [Proceedings of the International Conference «Artificial Famines in Ukraine of the 20th Century

»]. Kyyiv — Drohobych: Vydavnytstvo «Kolo». [in Ukrainian].

Petrenko, V. (2004). Holodomor 1932–1934 rokiv v Ukrayini yak zasib politychnoho teroru [The Holodomor

of 1932–1934 in Ukraine as a Means of Political Terror]. Aktualʹni problemy vnutrishnʹoyi polityky [Current

problems of domestic politics: a scientific journal], 124–136. [in Ukrainian].

Serbyn, R. (2008). Osmyslennya Holodomoru u svitli konventsiyi OON pro henotsyd [Understanding the

Holodomor in the Light of the UN Convention on Genocide]. Arkhivy Ukrayiny [Archives of Ukraine], (261),

–62. [in Ukrainian].

Sokolyk, O. (2013). Pytannya doslidzhenʹ ukrayinsʹkoyi istorychnoyi pravdy [Issues of research into Ukrainian

historical truth]. Naukovo–populyarna konferentsiya ta dobrochynnyy benket u Toronto 6 kvitnya 2013 r. [Scientific

and popular conference and charity banquet in Toronto, April 6, 2013] URL: http://ukrpohliad.org/

ukrayintsi–v–sviti/py–tannya– doslidzhen–ukrayins–koyi–istory–chnoyi–pravdy.html [in Ukrainian].

Stasyuk, O. (2007). Deformatsiya tradytsiynoyi kulʹtury ukrayintsiv v kintsi 20-kh — na pochatku 30-kh

rokiv KHKH st. [Deformation of traditional Ukrainian culture in the late 20s and early 30s of the 20th

century]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].

Tomilenko, L. (2015). Terminolohichna leksyka v suchasniy tlumachniy leksykohrafiyi ukrayinsʹkoyi literaturnoyi

movy: monohrafiya [Terminological vocabulary in modern explanatory lexicography of the Ukrainian

literary language: monograph]. Ivano-Frankivsʹk: Foliant. [in Ukrainian].

Wheatcroft, S. (2013). Mapping crude death rates in Ukraine in 1933 and explaining the raion patterns. Holod

v Ukrayini u pershiy polovyni KHKH stolittya: prychyny ta naslidky (1921–1923, 1932–1933, 1946–1947).

[The cold in Ukraine in the first half of the 20th century: causes and consequences (1921–1923, 1932–1933,

–1947).]. Kyyiv, 20–21 lystop. 2013 r. Kyiv, 219–226. [in English].

Yatsenko, Ye. (1999). Holodomor 1932–1933 rokiv na Kharkivshchyni [Holodomor of 1932–1933 in the

Kharkiv region]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].