Main Article Content
Introduction. In the fi rst third of the 20th century the ideology of agrarianism reached the peak of its popularity in
the countries of Central and Eastern and South-Eastern Europe, which was marked by the design of its numerous national
variants: Bulgarian, Czechoslovak, Polish, Yugoslavic, Romanian, Ukrainian, Hungarian, German and Baltic.
The experience of agrarianism in Bulgaria and Czechoslovakia seems especially interesting and valuable. It formed in
different political and socio-economic conditions; in many cases these regional options were at the forefront of the agarist
movement during the «golden age of the European peasantry» (according to the historian A. Toshkov, – period between world
wars, when the «peasantry became a political entity, understood its destiny, realized its purpose and organized itself in defense
of the third way, alternative to communism and capitalism»).
Purpose is to fi nd out the causes and circumstances of the ideology of agrarianism in Czechoslovakia and Bulgaria, to
carry out their comparative analysis, to fi nd out their European context.
Results. The article offers a comparative analysis of the Bulgarian and Czechoslovak variants of European agrarianism
of the fi rst third of the 20th century. The causes and circumstances of agrarianism in Bulgaria and Czechoslovakia are studied,
as well as their national features are clarifi ed from the comparative perspective. The activities of political parties of agrarian
orientation (Bulgarian Agrarian National Union and Republican Party of Farmers and Peasants in Czechoslovakia) were
compared. Their activity at the international level – as a part of the International Agrarian Bureau (Green International) was
also found out. Special attention was paid to the contacts between Ukrainian theorists and practitioners of agrarianism with
their Czechoslovak and Bulgarian like-minded persons. The reasons and circumstances of the decline in the popularity of the
ideology of agrarianism in Bulgaria and Czechoslovakia were explained.
Conclusion. The uniqueness of the Bulgarian and Czechoslovak variants of agrarianism of the fi rst third of the 20th
century was due to a number of circumstances and facts.
Features of Bulgarian agrarianism: 1) the development of agrarian thought in Bulgaria was signifi cantly infl uenced by
German and Russian agrarianism; 2) Bulgarian Agrarian National Union (BANU) is one of the oldest and most infl uential
political parties of agrarian orientation in Central and Eastern and South-Eastern Europe; 3) the Bulgarian version is a classic
example of the traditional version of agrarianism, focused on small and medium-sized peasants households; 4) Bulgarian
agrarianism was the most radical variant of agrarian ideology, which, in contrast to the democratic tactics inherent in
agrarianism, advocated the idea of establishing a dictatorship; 5) the ideology of Bulgarian agrarianism of the fi rst third of
the 20th century had anti-urban, anti-Semitic and religious aspects; 6) Bulgarian agrarians were the fi rst among the agrarian
parties of Central and Southeastern Europe to come to power (1919), but also lost it fi rst (1923); 7) BANU became the only
agrarian party in Europe that ever came to power with a majority government, not just as part of a coalition.
Features of Czechoslovak agrarianism: 1) the development of agrarian thought in Czechoslovakia was signifi cantly
infl uenced by French agrarianism; 2) Czechoslovakia had the most developed industry (after Germany) in Central and Eastern
Europe, and also had a relatively democratic political system, which created specifi c conditions for the development of agrarian
ideology in the interwar period; 3) the agrarian parties of Czechoslovakia maintained strong positions in parliament and
government throughout the interwar period; 4) the popularity of agrarianism in Czechoslovakia persisted until the end of the
1930’s, when in other countries of Central and Southeastern Europe it declined or disappeared; 5) Czechoslovak agrarianism
of the interwar period was marked by the most extensive network of periodicals in Europe; 6) the Czechoslovak organization
was the most powerful in the International Agrarian Bureau; 7) focused on farming, the Czechoslovak variant was one of
the most moderate and most progressive variants of agrarianism; 8) at the turn of the 1920’s and 1930’s, active cooperation
between Czechoslovak and Ukrainian agrarians was maintained, the most notable center of which was the Ukrainian Agrarian
Society in Podebrady.
Despite a number of differences and peculiarities of the program principles of the Bulgarian Agrarian National Union
and the Czech Agrarian Party, their ideology was based on peasant centrism, as evidenced by the link between the political and
socio-economic future of Bulgaria and Czechoslovakia and the peasantry/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Galushko, K. (1999). Hetmanska ideolohiia V. Lypynskoho 1920 – 1929 rr. : problemy interpretatsii [Hetman’s ideology of
V. Lypynsky 1920 – 1929: problems of interpretation]. Studii z arkhivnoi spravy ta dokumentoznavstva – Studies in archival affairs
and document science, 5, 64–70 [in Ukrainian].
Galushko, K. (2000). «Khliborobska ideolohiia» V. Lypynskoho u systemi skhidnoievropeiskoho ahraryzmu [V. Lypynsky’s
«Agricultural Ideology» in the System of Eastern European Agrarianism]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zbirnyk, 2, 164–200 [in Ukrainian].
Horanovych, M. (1971). Agrarian crisis and disintegration of the agrarian union of the countries of Eastern and SouthEastern Europe, 1930 – 1933. Moscow: Science [in Russian].
Horanovych, M. (1967). Collapse of the Green International (1921 – 1938). Moscow: Science [in Russian].
Dimov, N. (1980). Al. Stamboliyski, agrarnite dvizheniya v Evropa i mezhdunarodnata deynost na BZNS [Al. Stamboliyski,
the agrarian movements in Europe and the international activity of the Bulgarian Agrarian Union]. Aleksandar Stamboliyski: zhivot,
delo, zaveti, 363-381 [in Bulgarian].
Matveev, G. (1992). «Tretij put’?»: Ideologiya agrarizma v CHekhoslovakii i Pol’she v mezhvoennyj period [«The third
way?»: The ideology of agrarianism in Czechoslovakia and Poland in the interwar period]. Moscow : Publishing house of Moscow
State University [in Russian].
Matveev, G. (1989). Formirovanie ideologii cheshskih agrariev v konce XIX – 1914 g. [Formation of the ideology of Czech
agrarians at the end of XIX – 1914]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, 8 (ser. «History»), 5, 42-55 [in Russian].
Noskova, A. (1981). K voprosu ob agrarizme i krest’yanskom dvizhenii v stranah Central’noj i YUgo-Vostochnoj Evropy v
mezhvoennyj period [On the issue of agrarianism and the peasant movement in the countries of Central and South-Eastern Europe in
the interwar period]. Sovetskoe slavyanovedenie, 2, 40-57 [in Russian].
Pikovska, T. V. (2016). Національні програми Чехословацької Республіканської (аграрної) партії (1899 – 1922 рр.)
[National Programs of the Czechoslovak Republican (Agrarian) Party (1899 – 1922)]. Hileia: naukovyi visnyk, 115, 455–458 [in
Podoliak, K. (1930). Do idei ahraryzmu [To the idea of agrarianism]. Selo – The Village, 1, 11–13 [in Ukrainian].
Podoliak, K. (1930). Do idei ahraryzmu [To the idea of agrarianism]. Selo – The Village, 2, 25–29 [in Ukrainian].
Sorokin, P. (1924). The ideology of agrarianism. Prague: Khutor [in Russian].
TsDAVO of Ukraine. F. 4465. Op. 1. Spr. 747. «G. Simantsiv’s report “Innovative agrarianism”», 1929. 37 lists [in
TsDAGO of Ukraine. F. 269. Op. 1. Spr. 1093. «Draft programs, statutes and regulations of the Ukrainian Agrarian Society.
Resolution-protest of the lecturers of the Ukrainian Academy of Economics in Czechoslovakia in the case of mass arrests in Ukraine
(14.12.1929). Communicate of the Ukrainian Agrarian Society, parts 1-2. Protocols of general meetings of the Ukrainian Agrarian
Society. Calculations of sending the magazine «Village». Protocols of the meeting of supporters of the agrarian cause in Warsaw, 1930
– 1931». 101 lists [in Ukrainian].
Bell, J. (1977). Peasants in Power: Alexander Stamboliski and the Bulgarian Agrarian National Union, 1899 – 1923.
Princeton University Press. [in English].
Cesar, J. & Cerny, B. (1959). On the ideology of Czechoslovak agrarianism. Ceskoslovensky casopis historicky. No. 2, S.
–285 [in Czech].
Eellend, J. (2008). Agrarianism and Modernization in Inter-War Eastern Europe. Societal change and ideological formation
among the rural population of the Baltic area 1880–1939. Huddinge, 35–56 [in English].
Frankenberger, O. (1923). Agrarianism: National farms are the views of the rural people. Praha : A. Neubert [in Czech].
Frankenberger, O. (1931). The agricultural crisis and the means to solve it. Praha : Česka narodohospodařska společnost
Harna, J. & Lacina, V. (2007). Political programs of the Czech and Slovak agrarian movement, 1899 – 1938. Praha:
Historicky ustav [in Czech].
Hemmerling, Z. (1987). People’s movement in Poland, Bulgaria and Czechoslovakia, 1893 – 1930. Warszawa : Ludowa
Społdzielnia Wydawnicza [in Polish].
Hodža, M. (1930). Agrarianism: A series of lectures «on the ideology of Czechoslovakian political parties». Praha : USČS
Hodža, M. (1924). Agrarianism in Slovenia. Ljubljana : Kmetijska tiskovna zadruga [in Slovenian].
Hodža M. (1931). Articles, speech, study. Volume IV, Paths of Central European Agrarian Democracy 1921 – 1931. Praha
: Novina [in Czech].
Holec, R. (2010). Ideological sources of international agrarianism and its national specifi cs. Agrarni strana a jeji zajmove,
družstevni a peněžni organizace. Uherske Hradiště. Vol. 15, S. 51–72 [in Czech].
Holeček, J. (1928). Peasantry. Praha [in Czech].
Kettner, J. (1931). Liberalism, socialism and agrarianism. Praha [in Czech].
Kornovenko, S., Zemzulina, N. (2019). Ukrainian agrarianism as an option of eastern european agrarism in political
programs of the ukrainian national parties of the period of the Ukrainian revolution. Ukrainskyi Selianyn – Ukrainian Peasant, 21,
–20 [in English].
Kornovenko, S. & Pasichna, Y. (2019). Eastern european agrarianism. Ukrainian intellectual space in the late 19th and early
th centuries. Ukrainskyi Selianyn – Ukrainian Peasant, 22, 24–30 [in English].
Kornovenko, S. (2019). The ideology of Eastern European agrarianism in the programmatic provisions of Czechoslovak and
Ukrainian political parties (in the face of social and political turmoil of the early 20th century). Acta historica Neosoliensia Vedecký
časopis pre historické vedy, 22 (2), 4–23 [in English].
Kubů, E. & Lorenz, T. & Müller, U. (2013). Agrarianism and the agrarian elites in East Central Europe. Berlin : Berliner
Wissenschafts-Verlag [in German].
Lech, A. (2007), Agrarianism in the Slavic people’s movement (1918 – 1939). Dzieje partii i stronnictw chłopskich w
Europie. Narodziny i rozwoj. Pułtusk–Warszawa, T. 1, 33–42 [in Polish].
Mareš, M. & Pšeja P. Agrarian and Peasant Parties in the Czech Republic: History, Presence and Central European Context.
and%20Peasant%20Parties%20in%20the%20Czech%20Republic.pdf [in English].
Oren, N. (1973) Revolution Administered: Agrarianism and Communism in Bulgaria, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP [in
Paleček, A. (1933). New peasantry (basics of ruralism). Praha : Orbis [in Czech].
Peknik, M. (2008). Milan Hodža and the agrarian movement. Bratislava : Ustav politickych vied SAS [in Czech].
Rubacha, J. (2011). People’s Movement in Bulgaria 1914 – 1944. Studia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Srodkowo-Wschodniej,
, 63–84 [in Polish].
Rychlik, J. & Holeček, L. & Pehr, M. (2015). Agrarianism in Central and Eastern Europe in the 19th and 20th centuries.
Praha : CEVRO Institut [in Czech].
Schultz, H. & Harre, A. (2010). Farming societies on the way to modern agrarianism in East Central Europe from 1880 to
Wiesbaden : Harrassowitz Verlag [in German].
Stepankova, O. (1961). On the ideology of the agrarian. Sbornik praci Filozofi cke fakulty brněnske univerzity, 10 (G5),
–69 [in Czech].
Švehla, A. (1925). Three refl ections on agrarianism. Praha : MAB [in Czech].
Tomek, M. (2012). Ukrainian monarchist emigration to Czechoslovakia and the organization of the Agrarian Party. Regional
peculiarities of the policy of the agrarian party in the period of the fi rst Czechoslovak Republic. Study of the Slovak Museum, 17,
–192 [in Czech].
Toshkov, A. (2019). Agrarianism as Modernity in 20th-Century Europe: The Golden Age of the Peasantry. Bloomsbury
Academic [in English].
Trencsenyi, B. (2014). Transcending Modernity: Agrarian Populist Visions of Collective Regeneration in Interwar East
Central Europe. Regimes of Historicity in Southeastern and Northern Europe, 1890 – 1945. London, 119–145 [in English].
Wojnicki, J. (2020). Restitution and transformations of agrarian groups in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe.
Wschód Europy Studia humanistyczno-społeczne, 6(1), 31–52 [in Polish].